“A counter argument that has been gaining some ground…”

That's a similar title to the last post, but this blog post in specific drew my attention. 

A counter argument that has been gaining some ground goes like this – if the rich are responsible for so much of the problem, we should work with them to solve it… does this general approach make sense? Is it pragmatic? 

“Most people see this as a reason to loathe the affluent, but wouldn’t it make more sense to see them as an enormous opportunity to create fast and dramatic change for global warming? If the 20% well-to-do offset their CO2 emssions by 50%, that would mean an overall decrease of 40%.” 

Everything within me rankles at this suggestion, but I wonder if I’m just to idealistic? Can the wealthy really just buy us out of this mess?

A very good question. Any new approach is bound to be met with skepticism. But new ideas are never without controversy, and it's heartening to see people who are naturally skeptical give a fair hearing to a novel approach.
We're all on the same page — climate change is almost certainly the greatest existential threat any of us have faced since the end of the cold war. 

It's not going to be easy, but it's going to require open minds and pragmatism, and it's great to see a glimmer of hope that all of us working towards the same goal can recognize that and act accordingly.

9 thoughts on ““A counter argument that has been gaining some ground…””

  1. I always read your blogs something everyday because I like your thought and I get many advice after read you article. I tell to my other friends about this site & its’s blog. I hope you will read my this comment and you will remember me. i want

  2. After only a few weeks, I’ve found a number of things wrong with the Palm Pre I posted about back in September. I know, I know, I switch phones a lot and have been pretty impatient the last few years with these sorts of things, but I really made a bad choice with the Pre. Initially I was OK with how cheap the phone appeared to be because of all of the webOS features, and the speed that I got from Sprint’s network over AT&T. But that waned quickly with the other things that started cropping up. Sure, the Sprint network was better than AT&T, but it still sucked at home much of the time, and at work as well.

  3. We watched some football on TV too. (Yes, Ohio State beat Penn State in a big game!) We dined at home, too. On Sunday, my wife and I went to Mass in Miramar Beach FL, and there, a couple of “small things” registered on my “happiness meter.” Behind the choir were a couple of music stands in the aisle. Sitting at the frontmost stand in a wheel chair was a lady who had to be less than 5 ft.

  4. Präsident der Palästinensischen Autonomiebehörde Mahmoud Abbas bietet Jagd erklärt, er wird bei der jeweiligen UN-Sicherheitsrat Lokale Behörde oder des Rates für die vollständige regulären UN-Mitgliedschaft in einer palästinensischen behaupten, gelten [url=http://www.uggkaufen.net/%5Dugg stiefel[/url] , berichtete er ganze UN stehen erschienen zu einem neuen namhaften geeignet für alle palästinensischen Leute. Das Ziel ankommt, bevor ein neues Treffen mit der UN Gemeinsame Zusammenstellung Sonntag. Herr Abbas gehen Sätze nach oben eine Konfrontation mit Israel, die diese Arbeit Ansichten zur Hoffnung, diese zu trennen., [url=http://www.uggkaufen.net/damen-stiefel-wholesale-34.html%5DDamen Stiefel[/url] , ist Washington zusätzlich Gegenteil, erklärt, wird es schließlich mit dem Veto zu arbeiten. US-ALL-Administratoren forderte die 2 wichtigsten Eigenschaften, um wieder in Richtung Verhandlungen Schreibtisch, was jemals in Manhattan passiert.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.