Are Capitalism and Altruism Compatible?

Now there’s a light topic.

Or perhaps to state it another way, is being altruistic compatible with acting in your own self interest? Aren’t those two things diametrically opposed?

Or to get to the crux of the matter, can a market based approach be compatible with the goal of advancing the common good? Short answer: yes. For my stab at a long answer, see below. Of course, it depends on how you look at it.

I’ve been meaning to follow up on some of the ideas raised by the Prisoner’s Dilemma issues in the last post, so let’s start by rushing to the conclusion, with a quote from Mario Henrique Simonsen:

Moreover, as game theorists have shown, the ruthless pursuit of self-interest often results in a comparative loss for everyone. Game theorists often appeal to what is known as the Prisoner’s Dilemma. Typically, the Prisoner’s Dilemma provides an example of a situation in which two people are faced with a choice about whether to act in a self-interested way or altruistically, and the example shows that both come out ahead if both act altruistically. Peter Singer gives an interesting variation of this dilemma in The Expanding Circle. Imagine two early human hunters who are confronted with a saber tooth tiger. If the tiger chases them, the tiger will only be able to chase one of them but will have at least a ninety percent chance of catching and killing the one that is chased. If both stand their ground together, there is only a very small chance that the tiger could kill either of them. If both hunters are narrowly self-interested, they will both flee in order to save their own skin and there is a fifty-fifty chance for each hunter of being caught and killed. If, on the other hand, both are altruistic and both stay to help the other hunter, then in fact both will benefit. In some situations, in other words, individuals actually derive more benefit by not being self-interested!

Let’s build our own sabre-tooth-model then. There are ten people who believe in cooperation in one village. Ten who only act in a ruthless and caricatured version of self-interest in another village, on the other side of the river. In each, along comes a saber-toothed tiger that’s hungry. Assume that the tiger only needs to eat one person a day to be happy. Assume that the tiger is faster than any given person. Assume that the tiger is really tough to kill, but 5 people could do it together if they try hard enough.

Day one. Tiger comes. In the first village someone gets eaten as they are caught surprised. In the other, everyone runs instantly. The slowest is killed. In the first village, they get together. The fastest runners decide also that everyone will work together, the next day they gang up and try to kill the tiger. They may lose another one or two, but he’s dead eventually. In the other village, the tiger comes each day and kills the slowest runner. Two weeks later, every single person is gone.

Aha.

So one responds — banding together is not altruism, obviously, since if we don’t do it we all die, so the other village (who act only by ruthless self-interest) would have done the same thing, they say. They’d just do it for a different reason, because it’s also in their self interest.

But how? Nobody knew he was coming back the next day. Or any given person could have just run, and hoped that 5 others were able to kill the tiger and they would have avoided all risk.

Ok, so how do you deal with a system of rewards and penalties that is infinitely more vague and complex than this minor example? People can’t predict the future, they have to make assumptions. You cannot make an absolute case for self-interest against altrusim, because you cannot absolutely define which is which.

In short, one learns how to balance altruism with self interest. Or more accurately, one learns that rational self interest — and hence market based solutions — isn’t the opposite of altruism, with community, or with banding together to solve common problems.

If you view the above example through the prism of markets, and as an example of a market rendering judgement, the results of the invisible hand of said market are clear.

In one group everyone banded together, saw the oncoming existential threat to their entire community, and decided to do something about it. It didn’t necessarily require the authority of command, all it took was the collective realization that the community would live or die by tackling the problem together. In the other group people refused to recognize the threat they faced, or argued that it wasn’t rational for them individually to expend energy to face that threat. They ceased to exist.

When people talk about capitalism and markets that’s just another way of talking about incentives.

There’s no rule that says that self-interest has to be short sighted or blind. There’s nothing magical about markets. But there’s something very powerful about them, they present incentives and with lighting speed they channel resources towards those who adapt and thrive most efficiently.

As we face upcoming existential threats — global climate change for example — it’s comforting to remember that we’re all descendents of the first village, by definition. The second village didn’t make it.

17 thoughts on “Are Capitalism and Altruism Compatible?”

  1. I love the idea of a window-like mural. When we finished our basement we put beach scenes in the window wells (poly-coated) with dyed recycled tire “gravel/sand” on the bottom.Anyhow!
    Our store offers you all kinds of favourite products like Prada Handbags and Prada Handbags 2010 , Mens Prada Sunglasses with high quality, fashion style and competitive price.

  2. You can also insist on writing so good articles in your life for us.and I think you are a free man to do things as your ideals.pursit it.and now pls change our things with my website,link my name to know me.

  3. Merci de partager cette David.
    Je me suis intéressé à la façon dont les médias sociaux a été inclus dans l’enseignement supérieur. Ainsi, les exemples que vous fournissez sont très encourageants. Enseigner les médias sociaux serait un plaisir!

  4. Am Mittwoch, alle etwa 13 Uhr, eine zusätzliche Aufnahme von Bildern in Leads zu geschehen. Polizei verhaftet werden in der Regel die Analyse aller, [url=http://www.uggkaufen.net/%5DUgg Online[/url] , machbar eingehenden Links mit dem Nugget Brennen geht zu Ende. Nur ein Individuum, eine Art von Motorradfahrer, hat Chancen im Bauch durch nur eine Person unterwegs, indem Sie einfach in einem BMW zusammen mit farbigen Ihrem Windows-Programm ist eigentlich zu erwarten, um zu überleben worden, berichtete die Regulierungsbehörden. Die treibende Kraft beschleunigt, nachdem die sh fehlt, [url=http://www.uggkaufen.net/herren-stiefel-wholesale-26.html%5DHerren Stiefel[/url] , ooting, sowie als weiterhin bleiben gesucht. “Wir wollen nicht, um die Sicherheit einige unserer Bewohner”, berichtet Leads Bürgermeister Geno Martini im Einklang mit der Connected Media. “Der Bericht bietet einfach ein paar Werkzeuge und Strategien unserer eigenen Standort können und müssen mit, wenn diese bezieht sich auf die Arbeit.” Your Staat mit unerwarteten Notfall verbundenen macht es möglich, für die Stadt nicht-öffentlichen Eigentums oder Zuhause-Bereich bestimmt sind zu nutzen erklären, eine Ausgangssperre neben Bedingung Optionen nutzen, falls erforderlich.

Leave a Reply to cheap air jordan shoes Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.