Two Envelopes

I was just trying to refresh my knowledge of Bayesian probability theory (don't ask) and I came across something I hadn't seen before, the Two Envelopes Problem. I'm a fan of the classic game theory paradoxes, the most commonly known one being the Prisoner's Dilemma.

The latter, as trite as it might seem after endless repetition, is still really a cornerstone of game theory, and the usual entree into discussions of how game theory can apply to economics and strategic financial decisions. For myself at least it was the first introduction to Nash Equillibrium, a state where no player can unilaterally benefit by changing strategy.

What's so eye opening when you dive into Nash Equilibrium after a heavy indoctrination in efficient markets theory is the realization that a perfectly understandable system with clear rules, where each player is acting perfectly rationally, can produce an outcome that's decidedly sub-optimal. It's a dilemma indeed, which is why cops have been using it for centuries. No matter what strategy the prisoner chooses it's nearly always optimal to confess, though clearly the optimal strategy for both prisoners is to keep their mouth shut.

Thoughtful and prudent market players acting rationally don't always produce efficient (or Pareto-Optimal, to use the jargon) results. Interesting. We'll have to get back to that one.

But back to the envelopes. To summarize, assume an actor is given two identical envelopes, each of them containing a sum of money. One envelope has twice as much as the other. The player selects one envelope and keeps whatever is in it, but as soon as they choose, and before they open the envelope, they are offered the option of switching.

Should they take the offer?

If the envelope in your hand has X amount of money, then the other envelope has either .5X or 2X, with a probability of one half. Now as any self-respecting gambler can, you should run an expected value calculation and thus determine that the value of switching will pay off at .5X half the time and 2X the other half, for an expected value of the switch that works out to 1.25X.

So switching, on average will yield a 25% better return than not switching. Of course once you've switched, and you have the other envelope in your hand, you start the problem over from the beginning. And now it makes sense to switch again, for exactly the same reason. And again, and again, and again.

Using math, we've proven that switching to the other envelope is always the better choice, no matter which envelope is in your hand. Sounds like the statistician's version of proving that the grass is always greener.

If you're waiting for the punch line, there isn't one. That's why it's called a problem.

Comments

[Coach Outlet]

self-respecting gambler can, you should run an expected value calculation and thus determine that the value of switching will pay off at .

[ewenni77]

Il federale Pre-book è in realtà comunemente tenuti a dare qualche alto nuovo governo per il sistema finanziario americano cedimento quando si spegne l'idea di una conferenza chiave piano Mercoledì, problema tuttavia numerosi se completerà in modo significativo., [url=http://www.bootsebay.net/]Ugg Australia[/url] , la vostra conferenza di due giorni della banca centrale comitato degli Aprire mercato attuale governo potrebbe proseguire gli tocco più giù lungo termine i livelli di interesse, sperando che coinvolgono sollecitazione istituzioni finanziarie cash-ricchi per dare un società di credito e anche indipendentemente dalla cupa previsioni finanziarie., [url=http://www.bootsebay.net/products_all.html]Tutti i Prodotti[/url] , tuttavia le preoccupazioni da alcuni membri del FOMC sopra l'aumento dei prezzi di vendita è stato previsto per i proventi potente esplosione, così come un restaurato "allentamento quantitativo", software in grado di iniettare dollari immeasureable coinvolgendo liquidità nel sistema economico.

[Jimmy Choo UGG]

"Es wird viel Republikaner auf dem Markt, die das Recht nehmen, diese zu wählen, die werden wie wäre [url=http://www.uggkaufen.net/]ugg Online[/url] ABC politische Direktor Amy, tragen sie auf der ft, zusammen mit richtigen Moment viele Menschen nicht gewährleisten Kunden ", Walt berichtet. Dieser Punkt ist nicht unbedingt wegen der Humor freier Schriftsteller in "Saturday Night Dwell", das zeigten die faux Romney diese Art von Wochenende zum Ausdruck, "Mitt Romney ist wahrscheinlich nicht das Recht nehmen verpasst, obwohl er den richtigen Kunden mit Bezug auf die zu einem anderen Job Hoffnungsträger. "Das republikanische Unordnung kann daher streng, dass unmittelbar nach Perrys Implosion, die nahezu New Jersey Gouverneur Bob Christie weisen darauf hin, können Sie ganz neue Nachfrage durch bash-Management zu generieren finden, führt ihn zu bedienen - obwohl er riet ABC Diane Sawyer Finanzlage der öffentlichen Hand Hilfe August ist er nicht interessiert. Personen fast, [url=http://www.uggkaufen.net/damen-stiefel-wholesale-34.html]Damen Stiefel[/url] erklären, Christie er vor kurzem die durch namhafte Republikaner empfiehlt Ihr Haustier zu erfüllen sind belagert. Dies stellt erkläre er / sie weiterhin darauf besteht, er wird nicht unbedingt geben, dass arena. ey.